Why RCV
Wednesday, March 10, 2021
The results of a ranked-choice voting election. | Download Raw Summary Data
Legend
| Round | Eliminated | Winners |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | No “wasting your vote” by voting third party or voting for the “lesser of two evils.” | |
| Round 2 | Increased choice/voice for voters | |
| Round 3 |
Round 1
| Candidate | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| No “wasting your vote” by voting third party or voting for the “lesser of two evils.” | 2 votes in the first round | 66.67% 2 votes |
| Increased choice/voice for voters | 1 votes in the first round | 33.33% 1 votes |
| Encourages/allows more people to run, "breaks the duopoly" | 0 votes in the first round | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Decreases mudslinging/attack/negative campaigning / Combat fears of ‘the other’ | 0 votes in the first round | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Reduce need for expensive primaries Decreases polarization/partisanship | 0 votes in the first round | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Reducing extremist positions Increases representation among women and POC | 0 votes in the first round | 0.0% 0 votes |
Round 2
| Candidate | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| No “wasting your vote” by voting third party or voting for the “lesser of two evils.” | No change (Elected in Round 1) | 66.67% 2 votes |
| Increased choice/voice for voters | Elected: Gained 1 votes | 66.67% 2 votes |
| Encourages/allows more people to run, "breaks the duopoly" | Gained 1 votes | 33.33% 1 votes |
| Decreases mudslinging/attack/negative campaigning / Combat fears of ‘the other’ | 0.0% 0 votes |
|
| Reduce need for expensive primaries Decreases polarization/partisanship | 0.0% 0 votes |
|
| Reducing extremist positions Increases representation among women and POC | 0.0% 0 votes |
Round 3
| Candidate | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| No “wasting your vote” by voting third party or voting for the “lesser of two evils.” | No change (Elected in Round 1) | 66.67% 2 votes |
| Increased choice/voice for voters | No change (Elected in Round 2) | 66.67% 2 votes |
| Encourages/allows more people to run, "breaks the duopoly" | 33.33% 1 votes |
|
| Decreases mudslinging/attack/negative campaigning / Combat fears of ‘the other’ | 0.0% 0 votes |
|
| Reduce need for expensive primaries Decreases polarization/partisanship | 0.0% 0 votes |
|
| Reducing extremist positions Increases representation among women and POC | 0.0% 0 votes |
No “wasting your vote” by voting third party or voting for the “lesser of two evils.”
| Round | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 2.0 first-round votes. | 66.67% 2 votes |
| Round 2 | 66.67% 2 votes |
|
| Round 3 | 66.67% 2 votes |
Increased choice/voice for voters
| Round | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 1.0 first-round votes. | 33.33% 1 votes |
| Round 2 | Elected. | 66.67% 2 votes |
| Round 3 | 66.67% 2 votes |
Encourages/allows more people to run, "breaks the duopoly"
| Round | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 0.0 first-round votes. | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Round 2 | 33.33% 1 votes |
|
| Round 3 | 33.33% 1 votes |
Decreases mudslinging/attack/negative campaigning / Combat fears of ‘the other’
| Round | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 0.0 first-round votes. | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Round 2 | 0.0% 0 votes |
|
| Round 3 | 0.0% 0 votes |
Reduce need for expensive primaries Decreases polarization/partisanship
| Round | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 0.0 first-round votes. | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Round 2 | 0.0% 0 votes |
|
| Round 3 | 0.0% 0 votes |
Reducing extremist positions Increases representation among women and POC
| Round | What changed | Current total votes |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 0.0 first-round votes. | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Round 2 | 0.0% 0 votes |
|
| Round 3 | 0.0% 0 votes |
| Candidate name | Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| No “wasting your vote” by voting third party or voting for the “lesser of two evils.” |
66.67%2 votes |
66.67%2 votes |
66.67%2 votes |
| Increased choice/voice for voters |
33.33%1 votes |
66.67%2 votes |
66.67%2 votes |
| Encourages/allows more people to run, "breaks the duopoly" |
0.0%0 votes |
33.33%1 votes |
33.33%1 votes |
| Decreases mudslinging/attack/negative campaigning / Combat fears of ‘the other’ |
0.0%0 votes |
0.0%0 votes |
0.0%0 votes |
| Reduce need for expensive primaries Decreases polarization/partisanship |
0.0%0 votes |
0.0%0 votes |
0.0%0 votes |
| Reducing extremist positions Increases representation among women and POC |
0.0%0 votes |
0.0%0 votes |
0.0%0 votes |
Presents the Single Table Summary in a format readable by Wikipedia
Uses an iframe to embed the interactive Bar Chart
On sites that support embed.ly (including Medium, Wordpress, Canva, and more), you can just paste this URL
Copyright © 2025 RCVis.
Thank you to
our contributors.